Table of Contents
What is venture capital?
What is growth equity?
Potential risks and benefits of growth equity
Similarities and differences between venture capital and growth equity
The bottom line
Venture Capital vs. Growth Equity: Knowing the Differences
Venture Capital vs. Growth Equity: Knowing the Differences
Jun 28, 2022
7 min read
Learn how traditional venture capital and growth equity play formative roles in the life cycles of important startups—from inception to growth to a sale or IPO.
provides financing for innovative companies, often generating enormous profits and serving as an engine for U.S. economic growth. But such investments come with formidable risk. Growth equity, a form of venture capital, aims to temper that risk by investing in a private start-up company’s last stretch before it goes public or sells itself. The lower risk entails lower profit.
Often the same private equity firms do both traditional venture-capital and growth-equity investing.
Venture-capital funds finance young, private companies that the VCs hope will prosper.
VCs and their limited partners, as well as their growth equity counterparts, harvest profits in one of two ways: when the startup is bought by an established company or when the VC sells shares on the public market after the startup does an initial public offering, or IPO. Prominent traditional VC firms include Kleiner Perkins, Silver Lake Partners, Union Square Ventures and Sequoia Capital.
What keeps the money flowing into venture capital is the prospect of huge returns. In 2007, Union Square Ventures (USV) invested less than $5 million in Twitter’s series A funding round. Others steered clear, wary of the social messaging company’s ability to monetize the service.
USV later participated in some, but not all, funding rounds. When Twitter raised $1.8 billion in its 2013 IPO, earning a $14.2 billion valuation, that series A round was worth $863 million, generating a gain of 17,160% on USV’s investment, or an increase of about 136% annualized.
The traditional VC funding route follows a road map of successive rounds of funding for the startup, labeled by the letters of the alphabet. They often are timed to coincide with following benchmarks in a startup’s development.
. This typically takes place as the start-up performs initial market research, drafts a business plan, and lays out its legal and ownership framework. Funding at this stage tends to come from company management itself, friends and families, and angel investors. In the past, traditional VC firms did not finance the earliest stages of a start-up’s life but that has evolved and many VCs now invest in such early stage companies.
The startup is selling products and services, and generating revenue, though it’s losing money and needs more capital. Management should be able to articulate a pathway to profitability.
This typically occurs when the startup, having demonstrated management skill, a viable business model and market demand, is expanding production or services. The business must prove its ability to scale.
This round takes place when the young company is no longer really a startup, and has established a record of sales growth. It may expand product or service offerings, push into new markets and make acquisitions.
Some companies may require additional financing, especially if growth hasn’t followed a smooth trajectory. That may entail series D or more funding.
Venture capital comes with a number of potential risks and benefits, including:
It’s not easy for an institution to enter or exit a VC investment. A venture-capital fund typically has a lifespan of seven to 10 years from when it’s founded until it sunsets, distributing any profits, though sometimes gains may be disbursed along the way. During that time an investor’s money is locked up. Investors may unload their stakes in the fund to another investor, if covenants and stipulations permit.
There is a substantial risk of loss in individual VC investments because most startups fail, costing backers much or all of their money. The National Venture Capital Association estimates that 25% to 30% of all VC investments fail, while up to 40% only return their investors’ original capital. Another estimate puts the failure rate at 75%.
Some venture-capital firms have recognized huge returns from successes like Apple, Intel, and Amazon. Nevertheless, average overall returns are about the same as those in the stock market. Research firmCambridge Associates calculated that U.S. venture-capital returns averaged 10.9% annualized for the 20-year span ended Sept. 30, 2021. That is only slightly more than the roughly 10% average annual historical return of the Standard & Poor’s 500 Index.
Growth-equity firms target companies that have already completed series A, B, and C funding rounds but may not want to do an IPO or sell to a buyer for any number of reasons—including volatile public markets or major business developments like a new product or acquisition.
Traditionally, VC-funded start-ups expect to be ready for an exit—a corporate sale or IPO—soon after a series C funding round. So when a company seeks to drum up more capital in a series D round, it may signal a problem—a strategy miscue, unexpected competition, or operating issues.
Series E, F, and even G rounds raise more eyebrows. A company’s need for additional funding may force it to sell shares at a lower valuation—a scenario known as a down round, which will entail further dilution for earlier investors.
But many later-stage investment rounds are not due to problems. Enter growth equity. Growth-equity investors generally target maturing start-ups that have these characteristics:
A growth-equity firm looks for demonstrable revenue growth in a start-up. With several financing rounds behind the company and an operating history, it should have several quarters or more of rising sales.
It’s unlikely that the start-up is generating positive free cash flows at this stage, much less earnings, but negative profit margins should be narrowing.
Whether the start-up provides products or services, it should be gaining market share, or show evidence that the market it is addressing is growing rapidly and is scalable.
The new company should have a growing roster of customers, hopefully deep-pocketed ones that can generate more sales.
The start-up should be in the process of expanding its product or service offerings. Again, this bodes well for future sales—and profits.
Many of the potential risks and benefits of growth equity are similar to venture capital, including:
Growth equity has the potential to be highly profitable, although not to the same degree as traditional, earlier-stage venture capital investing. Growth equity investors target an internal rate of return of up to 40%, or about half that of other VCs.
Though less risky than traditional VC investments, growth equity still carries the risk of substantial losses.
Investors’ capital is generally tied up until a growth-equity firm unwinds the investments in a particular fund. The good news is that rather than seven or more years that traditional venture capital investments require, growth equity can be ready to return capital in three years or less.
Growth equity is part of venture capital and shares identical compensation, legal, and ownership structures with VC as a whole. There are several differences between the two, though.
The two investing styles have a number of similarities, including:
. Many venture capital firms operate as both traditional and growth-equity investors. But some firms concentrate on the latter, including TPG, General Atlantic, TA Associates, and Technology Crossover Ventures.
Growth-equity investments are generally lower risk than VC ones, but they can nevertheless be volatile. In 2018, Manhattan Venture Partners, a late stage-focused firm, was one of several investors including to invest in Coinbase’s series E funding round, which valued the cryptocurrency exchange at $36.19 a share. The shares closed at $328 on the first day of trading as a public company in April 2021. Amidst the tech stock bear market of 2022, Coinbase’s shares plummeted to less than $50 each.
There are some critical difference between the two, including:
Growth equity has a shorter time frame between the initial investment and exit. That can be just two to three years versus seven to 10 years for traditional VC investments. For this reason, illiquidity is less of an issue for growth equity.
Unlike with early stage VC investments, in which investors are essentially financing company-wide initiatives, like operations, R&D, and compensation, growth equity tends to focus on financing particular initiatives. These efforts may include geographic expansion, acquisitions, new products or services, or sales force expansion.
Growth equity is somewhat less risky than traditional VC. While traditional venture capital has a failure rate of 75%, according to one estimate, for growth equity the figure is believed to be lower, although there is little reliable data to verify that.
. Less risk also means less reward. Traditional VC aims for an internal rate of return (IRR) of 60% to 80%. By contrast, growth equity shoots for an IRR of 30% to 40%.
Traditional venture capital and growth equity play formative roles in the life cycles of important startups—from inception to growth to a sale or IPO. Some VC and growth-equity investments yield huge profits, yet most new companies struggle, and many don’t survive.
Growth equity carries lower risk than traditional VC investing because it usually targets more mature companies, often just before they do an IPO or sell to a corporate buyer. The lower risk also entails lower profit.
At Titan, we are value investors: we aim to manage our portfolios with a steady focus on fundamentals and an eye on massive long-term growth potential. Investing with Titan is easy, transparent, and effective.
Get started today.
Certain information contained in here has been obtained from third-party sources. While taken from sources believed to be reliable, Titan has not independently verified such information and makes no representations about the accuracy of the information or its appropriateness for a given situation. In addition, this content may include third-party advertisements; Titan has not reviewed such advertisements and does not endorse any advertising content contained therein.
This content is provided for informational purposes only, and should not be relied upon as legal, business, investment, or tax advice. You should consult your own advisers as to those matters. References to any securities or digital assets are for illustrative purposes only and do not constitute an investment recommendation or offer to provide investment advisory services. Furthermore, this content is not directed at nor intended for use by any investors or prospective investors, and may not under any circumstances be relied upon when making a decision to invest in any strategy managed by Titan. Any investments referred to, or described are not representative of all investments in strategies managed by Titan, and there can be no assurance that the investments will be profitable or that other investments made in the future will have similar characteristics or results.
Charts and graphs provided within are for informational purposes solely and should not be relied upon when making any investment decision. Past performance is not indicative of future results. The content speaks only as of the date indicated. Any projections, estimates, forecasts, targets, prospects, and/or opinions expressed in these materials are subject to change without notice and may differ or be contrary to opinions expressed by others. Please see Titan’s Legal Page for additional important information.
You might also like
How to Invest in Venture Capital: A Step-by-Step Guide
Venture Capital’s equity yields huge paydays if the startup is sold, goes public, or if the company fails. Other possible risks include illiquidity and less transparency.
Venture Capital vs. Private Equity
VC firms invest in tech startups in the early stages, while PE firms invest in all sectors, typically in well-established companies they seek to improve and then sell.
Venture Capital vs Angel Investing: Similarities and Differences
Angels and VCs share many characteristics but typically diverge in terms of investing. Both carry tremendous risk because most startups don’t get off the ground.
Venture Capital vs. Hedge Funds: Similarities and Differences
Both are formidable forces in the capital markets. They are focused on generating profits, but diverge in the allocation of money, the two can serve as complementary styles.