EDU: Holding through the upcoming catalyst

Update4 months ago
New Oriental Education and Technology Group, Inc. (EDU) is a leading consolidator in China's offline after-school tutoring (AST) market and a holding in Titan’s Offshore portfolio. EDU is well-positioned in a high-demand industry, taking share in a highly-fragmented market, and growing revenues and margins by capitalizing on their infrastructure and expertise.
However, over the past few weeks, growing speculation about potential government bans on weekend and holiday tutoring have caused EDU’s stock to decline 58% YTD through June 22nd.
While these rumors are a net negative for the stock, we believe the reaction has been overblown relative to the trustworthiness of the speculation. Put another way, we consider the stock’s reaction to be outsized compared to the impact rumors of this nature should have on forward probabilities and expected outcomes. We believe the stock now sits at levels we’d expect for an extreme downside case scenario: EDU’s price today reflects what we believe is a severe, low-probability event path, presumed by others as an inevitability.
Of course, it's impossible to predict what regulators will end up doing, and we always attempt to bake in a healthy margin of safety in our forward estimates. But we believe that the available evidence suggests that the severe outcome priced in today is far more likely to not materialize than materialize.
The more likely base case we've modeled contemplates a set of regulatory outcomes that effectively cuts EDU’s FY23e revenues by ~20%. Despite baking in a set of assumptions we would view as quite punitive / aggressive in nature, even that case would result in a valuation that is 23% above today’s levels.
As a result, we will be holding EDU until official news is released regarding the anticipated regulation, which we expect will happen sometime over the coming weeks. While there's of course no way of predicting the future, we believe the market is compensating shareholders extremely generously at these levels, based on our assessment of the events that led up to today and what they suggest about the forward event path.
We will be monitoring the upcoming developments carefully, and will be reviewing and updating our view immediately following the regulatory catalyst. More detail on our current thinking follows.
Stepping back: Why is the Chinese government focused on the education market?
As we’ve discussed in our prior research, the root of EDU’s recent share price weakness stems from recent concerns that the Chinese government might be looking to change the structure of the country’s education landscape.
China's population growth has decelerated over the decades, fueling fears that the economy will be dragged down as a result of an aging population. The Chinese government has taken several different steps to try to address this issue, including increasing its childbirth cap and introducing more affordable nursery services.
Alongside these measures, the government has also looked to education market regulation in their efforts to address China’s population deceleration.
For context, Chinese society is highly education-focused, and most families invest a significant amount of money into ensuring their children are prepared to succeed in China’s all-important college entrance exam (the “gaokao”).
The stress and cost of preparing for these exams have led some regulators to believe that they may be acting as a hindrance towards the new generations’ willingness to have more children.
Accordingly, China's government has recently imposed regulations on the AST industry, hoping it would help incentivize more population growth. To date, some of these have included:
not allowing AST providers to collect fees in excess of 3 months’ worth of classes, in order to help parents financially; and
closing AST institutions that don't meet educational qualifications, in order to improve the odds of success if parents choose to enroll their children in AST services.
Counterintuitively, these confirmed regulations may actually benefit industry leaders like EDU, as they impair the operations of smaller firms, allowing larger, more capitalized players like EDU to gain market share.
We believe the consolidation of power towards fewer AST players is also viewed as favorable from a regulatory perspective, as it should make it easier for the government to regulate the industry.
However, in recent months, rumors have circulated that China is poised to unveil an even tougher-than-anticipated crackdown on the AST industry, which has contracted multiples across China’s education sector.
So what happened recently?
On 5/12, reports circulated in Reuters that AST tutoring would be banned on weekends, which sent the stock down 19%.
On 5/24, days after President Xi Jinping’s announcement on the need for AST regulations, rumors surfaced online that the Beijing Haidian district would cancel summer classes, sending the stock down 18%.
On 5/25, the Beijing Haidian District refuted the rumors and confirmed summer classes would not be canceled. The stock increased 21% off the news.
A few weeks later, on 6/10, state-backed publisher Xinhua published a WeChat post, arguing against punitive regulation of the AST industry, such as a ban on weekend and holiday tutoring (detailed in our prior research), sending the stock up 8%.
On 6/16, Reuters wrote a follow-up piece, which largely rehashed prior rumors online but regardless sent the stock tumbling again, down 20%.
On 6/18, EDU published a blog post that refuted additional rumors circulating on WeChat of an internal company discussion that there would be no classes on weekends and holidays beginning in 2022.
It’s a lot to digest, but the stock has effectively bounced up and down as negative rumors traded shots with positive announcements from officials and non-anonymous sources. To our surprise, these official and state-backed announcements have had far less impact on the stock than the unsubstantiated speculation of the rumor mill.
What’s our take on all of this?
At current valuations, we believe the market is pricing in a severe downside scenario for EDU that is far more likely to not materialize than to materialize.
For reference, we believe at present valuations, the market is implicitly pricing in all of the following:
a ~1.5 day ban on weekend classes;
a ~35% headwind to capacity expansion growth;
a meaningful price headwind across all AST programs; and
a ~50% decline in pre-K revenues.
By contrast, we believe a far more measured regulatory outcome is most likely. Even assuming a fairly punitive outcome (a one day cut in K-9 weekend classes, a ~25% slowdown in capacity expansion growth, and low-single-digit headwind to price increases, which would effectively cut FY23e revenues by ~20%) would result in a valuation upwards of 23%+ off of today’s levels.
Here’s why:
We don’t consider the Reuters rumors very credible in their characterization of the anticipated regulatory action.
We’ve fact-checked prior exclusive stories of the Reuters journalist that
reported
the stories related to Chinese regulatory action, and found that her exclusives have
not necessarily been a reliable source
in predicting future events (see exhibit A below).
By contrast, all official comments on the rumors (including from state-backed media agencies) have suggested lighter-than-rumored regulatory action. Yet those official developments have been met by comparatively weaker stock rebounds than the anonymous speculation that sent prices down initially.
For example, Banyetan, a state-owned magazine run by Xinhua News Agency, criticized the notion of an outright ban and even suggested that they were aware of and unhappy with the impact recent rumors have had on equity markets, the latter of which we view as a very unusual but very welcome indicator that regulators are factoring in industry-side implications in their decision making process.
We covered Banyetan’s Wechat post in detail in our prior research, but in short the language from this post directly suggested three things:
Chinese regulatory authorities are not necessarily looking to end the after-school tutoring industry, and instead view it as an important supplement to the public school education system.
Regulators are conscious of the negative impact recent rumors have had on education sector investors and are willing to take steps to address that impact.
The government could be in favor of additional industry consolidation, which should benefit leading players like EDU and TAL, in line with our initial thesis.
Additionally, EDU refuted recent rumors of an internal company discussion of there being no classes on weekends and holidays beginning 2022.
Finally, stepping back from the rumor mill, we believe that there are multiple long-term, bigger-picture dynamics on both the regulatory and demand side that could drive a lighter-than-anticipated regulatory outcome.
Our research indicates demand will continue to remain high among parents in the coming years. A weekend and holiday ban would cause parents to seek out tutoring services from non-accredited sources (much like what followed a similar effort to regulate tutoring markets in South Korea in the early 80s). This would go against the government’s stated goal of ensuring a regulated “high-standard” education system across AST programs.
Additionally, to date unsubstantiated rumors have been a remarkably weak indicator of government action, both across the Chinese regulatory landscape and within the education industry in particular. Focusing on the education industry:
As mentioned above, rumors emerged on 5/24 that the Beijing Haidian district would be canceling summer AST classes, sending offline AST stocks down 17%+. The Board of Education responded one day later that the rumors were not true.
Earlier last year, rumors emerged that education companies would not be allowed to advertise their services. Instead, the government fined 15 AST firms for a combined value of $5.7M (constituting little more than a slap on the wrist), with a warning that there would be repercussions for ASTs that broke advertising rules going forward. In other words, no advertising ban has taken place as of Jun-21 despite prolonged online rumors.
Rumors emerged this year that pre-K AST classes would be cancelled across China. Recent developments in Beijing suggest that pre-K classes will be allowed, but that these students would simply just not be allowed to take advanced elementary classes. Again, the reality that is playing out here is far less extreme than the unsubstantiated rumors that have leaked.
While this does not necessarily indicate anything about the future, it’s an important data point to keep in mind as we assess the slate of facts and evidence.
Lastly, it’s important to keep in mind that the Chinese government has many competing considerations at hand alongside this potential regulatory action: they must balance the need for population growth measures with the global competitiveness of their Gen-Z and Gen Alpha population, and the job stability of the 400k+ institutions in China’s AST industry. These are significant considerations we believe the government will weigh with seriousness.
Holding EDU through the regulatory catalyst
While the eventual regulatory outcome could take any number of shapes, we believe on a probability-adjusted basis that the fair value for EDU is meaningfully above where the stock is trading today.
The above summarizes why we will be holding EDU through the upcoming regulatory catalyst. Again, while anything is possible, we believe the market is compensating shareholders generously at these levels based on our assessment of the event path that led up to today, and what it suggests about the forward event path.
Our investment team will be monitoring the upcoming developments carefully, and we'll be reviewing and updating our assessment of the stock immediately following the regulatory event. Stay tuned for more.

Become a Titan investor today.

Titan Global Capital Management USA, Inc ("Titan") is an investment adviser registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). By using this website, you accept our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Titan’s investment advisory services are available only to residents of the United States in jurisdictions where Titan is registered. Nothing on this website should be considered an offer, solicitation of an offer, or advice to buy or sell securities. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Any historical returns, expected returns [or probability projections] are hypothetical in nature and may not reflect actual future performance. Account holdings are for illustrative purposes only and are not investment recommendations. The content on this website is for informational purposes only and does not constitute a comprehensive description of Titan’s investment advisory services.
Refer to Titan's Program Brochure for more information. Certain investments are not suitable for all investors. Before investing, consider your investment objectives and Titan’s fees. The rate of return on investments can vary widely over time, especially for long term investments. Investment losses are possible, including the potential loss of all amounts invested. Brokerage services are provided to Titan Clients by Apex Clearing, an SEC registered broker-dealer and member FINRA/SIPC. For more information, see our disclosures. Contact: 110 Greene Street, Suite 910, New York, NY 10012. Information provided by Titan Support is for informational and general educational purposes only and is not investment or financial advice.
© Copyright 2021 Titan Global Capital Management USA, Inc. All Rights Reserved.